By now, most people in the SEO industry are more than familiar with the various animal named updates that have made it nearly impossible to rank without high-quality content. One of the most famous ones is Google Panda, which directly targets on-site content quality and severely penalizes sites that have spelling and stylistic errors or were not edited well.
Some of you may be wondering if we would class Spin Rewriter 9.0 as being a scam? Well, the simple answer to that is no, I wouldn’t say that this software is a scam at all. Yes, the software is quite expensive and the sales funnel is designed to make both creators and the affiliate marketers as much money as possible, but I wouldn’t say its a scam.
Its guaranteed that this tool will make rewriting jobs a lot easier than before because you can finally take a rest and let the software do the job for you. This is a wonderful tool indeed, and rest assured that everything will be perfect as long as you only use this tool for the sake of rewriting articles and not for changing a content thats the same as the article that you need to write and not rewrite. Expect that you will be able to make things a lot unique for the rewrites that you do with the aid of this tool because you now know how big its database is.
Would you ask somebody who does not talk great English and has no capabilities or experience to revamp site content? No? All things considered, this is precisely what many individuals do when they go to some modest administrations or specifically procure the least expensive specialists that they can discover, The final product is regularly add up to refuse that has unmistakably been composed by somebody that does not see either the subject or the dialect. Far more detestable it will regularly fall flat a literary theft checker which will cause you real issues with the web search tools.
That’s really weird. I have tested WordAI and Spin Rewriter with Copyscape and the results were always 80%+ uniquness, even 90%+. I don’t know how u spun the content to achieve such low results, but this is definitely way too bad. As for the block spinning, I have to be honest, this is the first time I’m hearing of it and I will have to check it out when I have a bit of time, but generally, yes, in the best case scenario, you would manually touch your Tier 1 content to make it 100% human readable and as unique as possible. For lower tiers, you can do pretty much anything, but again, the better quality of content, the better results you will have. That’s in my opinion and experience.
Welcome to the JVNP 2.0 Update featuring a primary JV invite courtesy of fellow JVNP 2.0 Partner Aaron Sustar (Spin Rewriter 9.0 launch affiliate program JV invite), Buzz Builders (Tradeology – Forex Growth Code Evergreen launch, Matt Clark + Jason Katzenback – Amazing Selling Machine 10 (ASMX) pre-launch), and More … in Today’s get behind Spin Rewriter #9 and earn lifetime recurring commission edition.
Hey Cathy, thanks for sharing about WordAi. It certainly is interesting, to say the least. I guess at some point all of us would want to automate our business and will look into programs like these for a solution. The example you showed gave me a very clear indication that the algorithm isn’t quite there yet. You seem too lenient in grading it because to me, it is practically unreadable. I believe hiring writers is a better use of that money.
Imo it is not possible for google to detect properly spun content, it is not worth computing power it requires. They can do this using ngrams for example, but it is uses a lot of queries. And for example article spinner I coded beats this algo, so google cant detect that the content is spun. Manual spinning is also good but it takes more than 30 minutes per article.
×