It’s just okay. Maybe I expected too much but it did not save me much time at all with all the changes I had to make to the articles. I used it on the “readable” setting and allowed it to automatically spin paragraphs, sentences, etc. Well it was actually “readable” but not human readable, also there is option for human readable articles, but it will be not 100% unique.
There is a completely new feature - Team Version, SpinnerChief 5 is the only article spinner that has a team version now, which is especially designed for team using, create/manage/use team thesaurus with team members together, and multi-users can use the license on different computer with themselves member accounts. Manager can manage team members easily.
Would you ask somebody who does not talk great English and has no capabilities or experience to revamp site content? No? All things considered, this is precisely what many individuals do when they go to some modest administrations or specifically procure the least expensive specialists that they can discover, The final product is regularly add up to refuse that has unmistakably been composed by somebody that does not see either the subject or the dialect. Far more detestable it will regularly fall flat a literary theft checker which will cause you real issues with the web search tools.
There are lots of reviews about the product, and many people here are writers that experienced a wonderful time doing their job with the aid of the tool. Most of these people usually say that you dont need to rely on the tool completely to get the job done because that will fail at most times. What you need to do according to the reviewers is that you should learn how to edit the article a bit so that it wont look completely spun since there are some clients that hate this tool.
But it is the most important that the spun text, especially with version 2.0 usually passes CS test, and Google cannot even see it as spun content. Such as content can be used for links building as well as on money sites and qualitity is pretty good, as you saw in the example. It is much better than other article spinners with similar pricing as they do not get the right meaning of each and every word, so the rewrites sometimes looks funny/strange. It is of course much better than any free article spinner/rewriter I have tried.
Spin Rewriter 9 is probably the best product in the market… I get great EPCs promoting it and, what is most important to me is that my clients actually love the product. Very low cancellation rates & practically no refund rates. All around it’s a fantastic product — if it fits your business at all, then you definitely have to get on board & promote it!
I think it is better to just come up with your own content. Most of those type of programs that are designed to make things easier, really just make things more difficult. You are right. The more you write, the more practice you get, and the better you’ll become. I have been writing for years myself, and I have never needed any content generation programs.
In this harsh industry who can't implement a small number of extra profit? Another upside will be that you can construct right up your cache of primary subject material and help to increase your good reputation for posting and potentially attract some more significant paying users. Lastly, simply just believe that of the experience you can be developing by owning to groundwork some of the ideas you generate about. You can be, or will be soon, a fountain of inadequate information.

In this harsh industry who can't implement a small number of extra profit? Another upside will be that you can construct right up your cache of primary subject material and help to increase your good reputation for posting and potentially attract some more significant paying users. Lastly, simply just believe that of the experience you can be developing by owning to groundwork some of the ideas you generate about. You can be, or will be soon, a fountain of inadequate information.
Imo it is not possible for google to detect properly spun content, it is not worth computing power it requires. They can do this using ngrams for example, but it is uses a lot of queries. And for example article spinner I coded beats this algo, so google cant detect that the content is spun. Manual spinning is also good but it takes more than 30 minutes per article.
×