But it is the most important that the spun text, especially with version 2.0 usually passes CS test, and Google cannot even see it as spun content. Such as content can be used for links building as well as on money sites and qualitity is pretty good, as you saw in the example. It is much better than other article spinners with similar pricing as they do not get the right meaning of each and every word, so the rewrites sometimes looks funny/strange. It is of course much better than any free article spinner/rewriter I have tried.
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 158.5 kB or 70% of the original size.
Although the idea of quickly being able to create content might sound fantastic, it certainly has its disadvantages. Firstly, Google don’t like badly written content. In the past article spinners have been renown for creating poor quality content. Badly written articles are something that Google hates and you won’t make any human friends with it either.
Andrew Darius, Dean H, Hikmet Manashirov, Jamie Lewis, Shreya Banerjee + Paul Counts, Dr Amit Pareek, Collin Almeida, John Assaraf, Luke Maguire + Simon Harries, Michel Sirois + Reed Floren, Kristie Chiles + Brandon Garland, David Gonzalez (Advance Your Reach), Adeel Chowdhry, Andrew Fox, Chris Fox + Simon Warner and other Fellow JVNP 2.0 Partners have active listings on the JVNewsWatch Launch Calendar, gathering JV Affiliate Partner prospects on autopilot …
×