When it comes to rewriting articles, there are times where doing it can be a lot stressful than ever, and this is very inconvenient as it can make your work slow and so is your productivity and payday. This is not a good thing for online writers and SEO specialists because this will be all of a hassle for their workday, and can give them a lot of stress.
Google is getting VERY good at catching spun content so you'd better be talented at manual spins. If they DO catch you, of course they'll spank you... and hard. So anything you use spun content on is inherently AT RISK. Worse yet... Google gets better at finding spun/poor content every year. So in the longrun you're screwed. I'd weight your other options and see if you couldn't find a cheaper source for manually hand written content.
I wanted to add some phrases in the text to see if the spinner will understand them and possibly replace them with similar phrases. As you see, this is just a simple short story that blew out of my head just a minute ago. As a final note of the intro section, I want you to understand that “thesaurus” simply means a database of words and their synonyms. Let’s see how this goes.
For a blogger who has to publish multiple blogs on daily basis, it is tough for them to write unique content, especially when writing on same topics. In that case, spin bot tool could be used to avoid self-plagiarism and to maintain the quality on blog posts. As spinbot change synonym automatically but you can pick the most relevant synonym using out tool.

I put the keyword in Google search, Open the first top 5 websites copy the content, manually edit those content add or remove good lines and convert 5 articles into 1 good article, then copy to spinner chief and rewrite manually. Add some good infographics made by me or stock images and embed my hand made video . my niche is, "how-to" "tutorials" so I can manually make some video. So can I rank this type of contents? With some pbn or web2.0

Imo it is not possible for google to detect properly spun content, it is not worth computing power it requires. They can do this using ngrams for example, but it is uses a lot of queries. And for example article spinner I coded beats this algo, so google cant detect that the content is spun. Manual spinning is also good but it takes more than 30 minutes per article.
×