The content above is 98% unique according to Spin Rewriter and I really like it. It actually seems better than the WordAI spin – only the “Standard” one however, it is no match for the “Turing”. One thing that the spinner failed to recognize is the “green eyes” phrase where it replaced it with “environment-friendly”. Yea, I laughed too. Anyway, here is the spintax for those interested in more testing:
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.1 kB or 76% of the original size.
Notice: Because of the 3 days free trial, we must use Paypal's subscription button even for a one-time price. Unfortunately Paypal has a bug that only allows you to set max 5 years for the subscription. So when you see Paypal's notice that your one-time fee is actually a subscription that will be renewed in 5 years, in fact it is not true, it is a one-time forever payment, NOT renewable after 5 years.
There are lots of reviews about the product, and many people here are writers that experienced a wonderful time doing their job with the aid of the tool. Most of these people usually say that you dont need to rely on the tool completely to get the job done because that will fail at most times. What you need to do according to the reviewers is that you should learn how to edit the article a bit so that it wont look completely spun since there are some clients that hate this tool.

Google is getting VERY good at catching spun content so you'd better be talented at manual spins. If they DO catch you, of course they'll spank you... and hard. So anything you use spun content on is inherently AT RISK. Worse yet... Google gets better at finding spun/poor content every year. So in the longrun you're screwed. I'd weight your other options and see if you couldn't find a cheaper source for manually hand written content.
The word is out ... there are potentially unlimited opportunities for making money online! But, at the same time, there is a lot of competition for these potentially lucrative opportunities. Not to worry, though. With the help of Article Rewriter Tool, the game has now changed -- in your favor. Before you might have been limited by your time or energy to market your website to major search engines, but now the results of your hard work can be multiplied by this free content rewriting service.
AnswersChief is the best professional market promotion software that aimed at YAHOO!ANSWERS. And the tailor-made AnswersChief aims at the newest version of YAHOO!ANSWERS. Not only can you automatically submit questions and answers with AnsweChief, but you can also insert images to your questions and answers. Even without submitting a link, customers will visit your site.
Exactly Mark! In my experience you can certainly write around 1000 words per hour, even if you are practically new to blogging. I personally think that spinning articles is just a gimmick that doesn’t really get results but wastes tons of time. The spinning software certainly makes a lot of money for the creators though! They are the ones who are laughing all the way to the bank!
Spin Rewriter 9 is probably the best product in the market… I get great EPCs promoting it and, what is most important to me is that my clients actually love the product. Very low cancellation rates & practically no refund rates. All around it’s a fantastic product — if it fits your business at all, then you definitely have to get on board & promote it!

Imo it is not possible for google to detect properly spun content, it is not worth computing power it requires. They can do this using ngrams for example, but it is uses a lot of queries. And for example article spinner I coded beats this algo, so google cant detect that the content is spun. Manual spinning is also good but it takes more than 30 minutes per article.

×